<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cleaner model</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fatescrew.com/archives/2523/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fatescrew.com/archives/2523</link>
	<description>The inner workings of a non-magical animation place.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:37:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole</title>
		<link>http://fatescrew.com/archives/2523/comment-page-1#comment-3239</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:52:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatescrew.com/?p=2523#comment-3239</guid>
		<description>Whatever works best for you guys - take it and run with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever works best for you guys &#8211; take it and run with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://fatescrew.com/archives/2523/comment-page-1#comment-3237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 08:27:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatescrew.com/?p=2523#comment-3237</guid>
		<description>Let us know what you&#039;re going for and we&#039;ll tack that angle. In this design, our major concerns are 1)Trench yes/no and 2)head/eye design. 

Upon consideration, the third head (they should be marked A/B/C top to bottom, but someone forgot to label their options) is probably a little too Grey Fox (MGS) and the three small lights won&#039;t read as well as the other shapes, especially in 009-01 where the figure is very small. Option B is neat in that it&#039;s unusual to have a vertical shape in the middle of the face, so it&#039;s alien and off-putting, but it also may not read clearly at a distance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us know what you&#8217;re going for and we&#8217;ll tack that angle. In this design, our major concerns are 1)Trench yes/no and 2)head/eye design. </p>
<p>Upon consideration, the third head (they should be marked A/B/C top to bottom, but someone forgot to label their options) is probably a little too Grey Fox (MGS) and the three small lights won&#8217;t read as well as the other shapes, especially in 009-01 where the figure is very small. Option B is neat in that it&#8217;s unusual to have a vertical shape in the middle of the face, so it&#8217;s alien and off-putting, but it also may not read clearly at a distance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cole</title>
		<link>http://fatescrew.com/archives/2523/comment-page-1#comment-3235</link>
		<dc:creator>Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 07:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fatescrew.com/?p=2523#comment-3235</guid>
		<description>Think we&#039;ll need to chat about this one - they all look great and can&#039;t choose...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think we&#8217;ll need to chat about this one &#8211; they all look great and can&#8217;t choose&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

